Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership

Michael Hobday, Howard Rush, John Bessant

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

As leading East Asian latecomer firms begin to compete on the basis of new product development and in-house research and development (R&D), they appear to confront a difficult strategic dilemma. Should they compete as R&D and brand leaders on the international stage or should they continue with their tried and tested formula of low cost catch up competitiveness? Most studies of East Asian firms focus on catch up innovation processes. By contrast, this paper focuses on the challenges facing latecomer firms in the transition phase from catch up to leadership status, in order to assess the ‘strategic dilemma’ argument and examine the nature of transition innovation. Based on in-depth interviews with leading Korean firms, the paper contends that the strategic dilemma argument is a misleading oversimplification of the main innovation challenges facing most Korean firms as they become more technologically advanced. Most of the major exporters (or chaebol) offer a portfolio of products, some of which are technologically advanced and others less advanced. Corporate innovation strategies tend to be executed in relation to the needs of specific products (or closely related product families) rather than ‘the firm’ in its entirety. In addition, many firms in many product areas have yet to reach the innovation frontier stage and even the leading chaebol continue to produce large volumes of products under sub-contracting and licensing agreements. Firm strategies tend to embody a mix of leadership, ‘followership’ and latecomer positions according to the product portfolio of the company in question. The study identifies various strategic options and difficulties facing Korean firms during the transition process and points to promising future research on latecomer transition.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1433-1457
Number of pages25
JournalResearch Policy
Volume33
Issue number10
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2004

Fingerprint

Phase transition
Korea
Innovation
Catch-up
Chaebol
Latecomer firms
Asia
Transition process
Firm strategy
Product portfolio
Subcontracting
Followership
Competitiveness
Exporters
Licensing
Strategic options
Product family
In-depth interviews
Corporate innovation
New product development

Keywords

  • Research and development
  • Exploratory study
  • Firm strategies
  • Innovation
  • CENTRIM

Cite this

Hobday, Michael ; Rush, Howard ; Bessant, John. / Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership. In: Research Policy. 2004 ; Vol. 33, No. 10. pp. 1433-1457.
@article{32f4ae4e506d4d4e821f9a2521749485,
title = "Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership",
abstract = "As leading East Asian latecomer firms begin to compete on the basis of new product development and in-house research and development (R&D), they appear to confront a difficult strategic dilemma. Should they compete as R&D and brand leaders on the international stage or should they continue with their tried and tested formula of low cost catch up competitiveness? Most studies of East Asian firms focus on catch up innovation processes. By contrast, this paper focuses on the challenges facing latecomer firms in the transition phase from catch up to leadership status, in order to assess the ‘strategic dilemma’ argument and examine the nature of transition innovation. Based on in-depth interviews with leading Korean firms, the paper contends that the strategic dilemma argument is a misleading oversimplification of the main innovation challenges facing most Korean firms as they become more technologically advanced. Most of the major exporters (or chaebol) offer a portfolio of products, some of which are technologically advanced and others less advanced. Corporate innovation strategies tend to be executed in relation to the needs of specific products (or closely related product families) rather than ‘the firm’ in its entirety. In addition, many firms in many product areas have yet to reach the innovation frontier stage and even the leading chaebol continue to produce large volumes of products under sub-contracting and licensing agreements. Firm strategies tend to embody a mix of leadership, ‘followership’ and latecomer positions according to the product portfolio of the company in question. The study identifies various strategic options and difficulties facing Korean firms during the transition process and points to promising future research on latecomer transition.",
keywords = "Research and development, Exploratory study, Firm strategies, Innovation, CENTRIM",
author = "Michael Hobday and Howard Rush and John Bessant",
year = "2004",
month = "12",
doi = "10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.005",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "1433--1457",
journal = "Research Policy",
issn = "0048-7333",
number = "10",

}

Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership. / Hobday, Michael; Rush, Howard; Bessant, John.

In: Research Policy, Vol. 33, No. 10, 12.2004, p. 1433-1457.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - Approaching the innovation frontier in Korea: the transition phase to leadership

AU - Hobday, Michael

AU - Rush, Howard

AU - Bessant, John

PY - 2004/12

Y1 - 2004/12

N2 - As leading East Asian latecomer firms begin to compete on the basis of new product development and in-house research and development (R&D), they appear to confront a difficult strategic dilemma. Should they compete as R&D and brand leaders on the international stage or should they continue with their tried and tested formula of low cost catch up competitiveness? Most studies of East Asian firms focus on catch up innovation processes. By contrast, this paper focuses on the challenges facing latecomer firms in the transition phase from catch up to leadership status, in order to assess the ‘strategic dilemma’ argument and examine the nature of transition innovation. Based on in-depth interviews with leading Korean firms, the paper contends that the strategic dilemma argument is a misleading oversimplification of the main innovation challenges facing most Korean firms as they become more technologically advanced. Most of the major exporters (or chaebol) offer a portfolio of products, some of which are technologically advanced and others less advanced. Corporate innovation strategies tend to be executed in relation to the needs of specific products (or closely related product families) rather than ‘the firm’ in its entirety. In addition, many firms in many product areas have yet to reach the innovation frontier stage and even the leading chaebol continue to produce large volumes of products under sub-contracting and licensing agreements. Firm strategies tend to embody a mix of leadership, ‘followership’ and latecomer positions according to the product portfolio of the company in question. The study identifies various strategic options and difficulties facing Korean firms during the transition process and points to promising future research on latecomer transition.

AB - As leading East Asian latecomer firms begin to compete on the basis of new product development and in-house research and development (R&D), they appear to confront a difficult strategic dilemma. Should they compete as R&D and brand leaders on the international stage or should they continue with their tried and tested formula of low cost catch up competitiveness? Most studies of East Asian firms focus on catch up innovation processes. By contrast, this paper focuses on the challenges facing latecomer firms in the transition phase from catch up to leadership status, in order to assess the ‘strategic dilemma’ argument and examine the nature of transition innovation. Based on in-depth interviews with leading Korean firms, the paper contends that the strategic dilemma argument is a misleading oversimplification of the main innovation challenges facing most Korean firms as they become more technologically advanced. Most of the major exporters (or chaebol) offer a portfolio of products, some of which are technologically advanced and others less advanced. Corporate innovation strategies tend to be executed in relation to the needs of specific products (or closely related product families) rather than ‘the firm’ in its entirety. In addition, many firms in many product areas have yet to reach the innovation frontier stage and even the leading chaebol continue to produce large volumes of products under sub-contracting and licensing agreements. Firm strategies tend to embody a mix of leadership, ‘followership’ and latecomer positions according to the product portfolio of the company in question. The study identifies various strategic options and difficulties facing Korean firms during the transition process and points to promising future research on latecomer transition.

KW - Research and development

KW - Exploratory study

KW - Firm strategies

KW - Innovation

KW - CENTRIM

U2 - 10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.005

DO - 10.1016/j.respol.2004.05.005

M3 - Article

VL - 33

SP - 1433

EP - 1457

JO - Research Policy

JF - Research Policy

SN - 0048-7333

IS - 10

ER -