An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering

Abdelraouf Hecham, Abdallah Arioua, Gem Stapleton, Madalina Croitoru

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNConference contribution with ISSN or ISBN

Abstract

In this paper we answer empirically the following research question:"Are dialectical explanation methods more effective than one-shot explanation methods for Intersection of Closed Repairs inconsistency tolerant semantics inexistential rules knowledge bases?" We ran two experiments with 84 and respectively 38 participants and showed that under certain conditions dialectica approaches are significantly more effective than one-shot explanations.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication30th International Workshop on Description Logics
Place of PublicationFrance
PublisherCEUR
Pages0-0
Number of pages1
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017
Event30th International Workshop on Description Logics - Montpellier, France, 18-21 July 2017
Duration: 1 Jul 2017 → …

Publication series

NameCEUR Workshop Proceedings

Conference

Conference30th International Workshop on Description Logics
Period1/07/17 → …

Fingerprint Dive into the research topics of 'An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

  • Cite this

    Hecham, A., Arioua, A., Stapleton, G., & Croitoru, M. (2017). An empirical evaluation of argumentation in explaining inconsistency tolerant query answering. In 30th International Workshop on Description Logics (pp. 0-0). (CEUR Workshop Proceedings). CEUR. http://www.dcs.bbk.ac.uk/~roman/dl17/paper3.pdf