Aesthetics of Interactive Art

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

Abstract

A digital artefact, by conventional standards, is even less authentic and original than a mechanically-reproduced one; a true simulation, a mathematical model of the real it has no original, and is therefore often ‘not even’ a copy. Furthermore, not only is the digital artefact accessible by the masses, it is very often interactive, i.e. shaped by audience input; a product of ‘the mass’ itself. Yet these material factors should not inhibit an academic discussion of the aesthetics of interactivity. An aesthetic value is always established by the consensus of an elite. In media studies for example, textual analysis of televisual artefacts clearly demonstrates that, whilst television might appear generally accessible and understood by everyone, there is quite clearly a relative, yet elaborate, aesthetic code operating within a wider, still elite, cultural context.
Original languageEnglish
Title of host publication‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’
Subtitle of host publicationCHArt Yearbook 2007 Computers & The History of Art
Volume3
Publication statusPublished - 2008

Fingerprint

Aesthetics
Interactive Art
Artifact
Elites
Aesthetic Value
Simulation
Interactivity
Cultural Context
Conventional
Mathematical Model
Media Studies
Textual Analysis

Cite this

Cham, K. (2008). Aesthetics of Interactive Art. In ‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’: CHArt Yearbook 2007 Computers & The History of Art (Vol. 3)
Cham, Karen. / Aesthetics of Interactive Art. ‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’: CHArt Yearbook 2007 Computers & The History of Art. Vol. 3 2008.
@inbook{6b2d02b8749745e9b2875f647491427c,
title = "Aesthetics of Interactive Art",
abstract = "A digital artefact, by conventional standards, is even less authentic and original than a mechanically-reproduced one; a true simulation, a mathematical model of the real it has no original, and is therefore often ‘not even’ a copy. Furthermore, not only is the digital artefact accessible by the masses, it is very often interactive, i.e. shaped by audience input; a product of ‘the mass’ itself. Yet these material factors should not inhibit an academic discussion of the aesthetics of interactivity. An aesthetic value is always established by the consensus of an elite. In media studies for example, textual analysis of televisual artefacts clearly demonstrates that, whilst television might appear generally accessible and understood by everyone, there is quite clearly a relative, yet elaborate, aesthetic code operating within a wider, still elite, cultural context.",
author = "Karen Cham",
year = "2008",
language = "English",
volume = "3",
booktitle = "‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’",

}

Cham, K 2008, Aesthetics of Interactive Art. in ‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’: CHArt Yearbook 2007 Computers & The History of Art. vol. 3.

Aesthetics of Interactive Art. / Cham, Karen.

‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’: CHArt Yearbook 2007 Computers & The History of Art. Vol. 3 2008.

Research output: Chapter in Book/Conference proceeding with ISSN or ISBNChapter

TY - CHAP

T1 - Aesthetics of Interactive Art

AU - Cham, Karen

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - A digital artefact, by conventional standards, is even less authentic and original than a mechanically-reproduced one; a true simulation, a mathematical model of the real it has no original, and is therefore often ‘not even’ a copy. Furthermore, not only is the digital artefact accessible by the masses, it is very often interactive, i.e. shaped by audience input; a product of ‘the mass’ itself. Yet these material factors should not inhibit an academic discussion of the aesthetics of interactivity. An aesthetic value is always established by the consensus of an elite. In media studies for example, textual analysis of televisual artefacts clearly demonstrates that, whilst television might appear generally accessible and understood by everyone, there is quite clearly a relative, yet elaborate, aesthetic code operating within a wider, still elite, cultural context.

AB - A digital artefact, by conventional standards, is even less authentic and original than a mechanically-reproduced one; a true simulation, a mathematical model of the real it has no original, and is therefore often ‘not even’ a copy. Furthermore, not only is the digital artefact accessible by the masses, it is very often interactive, i.e. shaped by audience input; a product of ‘the mass’ itself. Yet these material factors should not inhibit an academic discussion of the aesthetics of interactivity. An aesthetic value is always established by the consensus of an elite. In media studies for example, textual analysis of televisual artefacts clearly demonstrates that, whilst television might appear generally accessible and understood by everyone, there is quite clearly a relative, yet elaborate, aesthetic code operating within a wider, still elite, cultural context.

M3 - Chapter

VL - 3

BT - ‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’

ER -

Cham K. Aesthetics of Interactive Art. In ‘Digital Visual Culture, Theory and Practice’: CHArt Yearbook 2007 Computers & The History of Art. Vol. 3. 2008