A student–staff partnership approach to course enhancement

Principles for enabling dialogue through repurposing subject-specific materials and metaphors

Lucy Chilvers, Alice Fox, Sarah Bennett

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Mechanisms for listening and responding to students need to offer space for diverse voices and meaningful dialogue for greater student–staff partnership. This study explores the beneficial impacts and challenges of using creative pedagogical methods to support rich dialogue for module evaluation. A variety of evaluation activities were embedded throughout a postgraduate module, using creative materials and metaphorical reflective questions. Whilst there are logistical and perceptive barriers to adopting creative approaches, this paper demonstrates the beneficial impacts on both students’ and staffs’ experiences of learning and teaching, and the culture of partnership it develops. Deeper reflection and evaluation from students enabled inclusive student–staff dialogue. More nuanced and richer feedback allowed staff a responsive approach to module design, empowering the students and cultivating trusting student–staff relationships. Supporting the transferability of this practice across non-arts disciplines, principles for using discipline-specific materials and metaphors, for triggering reflection and evaluation are proposed.

Original languageEnglish
JournalInnovations in Education and Teaching International
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2 Oct 2019

Fingerprint

metaphor
dialogue
evaluation
student
staff
Teaching
learning
experience

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Innovations in Education and Teaching International on 2/10/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14703297.2019.1675530

Keywords

  • Student–staff partnership
  • student-engagement
  • evaluation
  • inclusive practice
  • creative methods

Cite this

@article{5c87af87d6294ee5b4c204caee99a702,
title = "A student–staff partnership approach to course enhancement: Principles for enabling dialogue through repurposing subject-specific materials and metaphors",
abstract = "Mechanisms for listening and responding to students need to offer space for diverse voices and meaningful dialogue for greater student–staff partnership. This study explores the beneficial impacts and challenges of using creative pedagogical methods to support rich dialogue for module evaluation. A variety of evaluation activities were embedded throughout a postgraduate module, using creative materials and metaphorical reflective questions. Whilst there are logistical and perceptive barriers to adopting creative approaches, this paper demonstrates the beneficial impacts on both students’ and staffs’ experiences of learning and teaching, and the culture of partnership it develops. Deeper reflection and evaluation from students enabled inclusive student–staff dialogue. More nuanced and richer feedback allowed staff a responsive approach to module design, empowering the students and cultivating trusting student–staff relationships. Supporting the transferability of this practice across non-arts disciplines, principles for using discipline-specific materials and metaphors, for triggering reflection and evaluation are proposed.",
keywords = "Student–staff partnership, student-engagement, evaluation, inclusive practice, creative methods",
author = "Lucy Chilvers and Alice Fox and Sarah Bennett",
note = "This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Innovations in Education and Teaching International on 2/10/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14703297.2019.1675530",
year = "2019",
month = "10",
day = "2",
doi = "10.1080/14703297.2019.1675530",
language = "English",
journal = "Innovations in Education and Teaching International",
issn = "1470-3297",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - A student–staff partnership approach to course enhancement

T2 - Principles for enabling dialogue through repurposing subject-specific materials and metaphors

AU - Chilvers, Lucy

AU - Fox, Alice

AU - Bennett, Sarah

N1 - This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Innovations in Education and Teaching International on 2/10/2019, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/14703297.2019.1675530

PY - 2019/10/2

Y1 - 2019/10/2

N2 - Mechanisms for listening and responding to students need to offer space for diverse voices and meaningful dialogue for greater student–staff partnership. This study explores the beneficial impacts and challenges of using creative pedagogical methods to support rich dialogue for module evaluation. A variety of evaluation activities were embedded throughout a postgraduate module, using creative materials and metaphorical reflective questions. Whilst there are logistical and perceptive barriers to adopting creative approaches, this paper demonstrates the beneficial impacts on both students’ and staffs’ experiences of learning and teaching, and the culture of partnership it develops. Deeper reflection and evaluation from students enabled inclusive student–staff dialogue. More nuanced and richer feedback allowed staff a responsive approach to module design, empowering the students and cultivating trusting student–staff relationships. Supporting the transferability of this practice across non-arts disciplines, principles for using discipline-specific materials and metaphors, for triggering reflection and evaluation are proposed.

AB - Mechanisms for listening and responding to students need to offer space for diverse voices and meaningful dialogue for greater student–staff partnership. This study explores the beneficial impacts and challenges of using creative pedagogical methods to support rich dialogue for module evaluation. A variety of evaluation activities were embedded throughout a postgraduate module, using creative materials and metaphorical reflective questions. Whilst there are logistical and perceptive barriers to adopting creative approaches, this paper demonstrates the beneficial impacts on both students’ and staffs’ experiences of learning and teaching, and the culture of partnership it develops. Deeper reflection and evaluation from students enabled inclusive student–staff dialogue. More nuanced and richer feedback allowed staff a responsive approach to module design, empowering the students and cultivating trusting student–staff relationships. Supporting the transferability of this practice across non-arts disciplines, principles for using discipline-specific materials and metaphors, for triggering reflection and evaluation are proposed.

KW - Student–staff partnership

KW - student-engagement

KW - evaluation

KW - inclusive practice

KW - creative methods

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85074034901&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1080/14703297.2019.1675530

DO - 10.1080/14703297.2019.1675530

M3 - Article

JO - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

JF - Innovations in Education and Teaching International

SN - 1470-3297

ER -