A new occupational heat tolerance test: A feasibility study

Emily R. Watkins, Jemma Gibbons, Yanoula Dellas, Mark Hayes, Peter Watt, Alan J. Richardson

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

Abstract

Heat tolerance tests identify those susceptible to heat illnesses and monitor heat adaptations. Currently, tolerance tests do not replicate the uncompensable heat strain environments experienced in some occupations. In addition, tests can take up to 2 h to complete, and cannot offer intra and inter individual comparisons, due to the use of a fixed exercise intensity. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a new heat occupational tolerance test (HOTT: 40 min at 6 W kg−1 metabolic heat production, 50 °C 10% RH, in protective clothing) to the standard heat tolerance test (HTT: 2 h walk at 5 km h−1 1% gradient, 40 °C 40% RH, in shorts and t-shirt). Eighteen participants (age: 21 ± 3 yrs, body mass: 81.3 ± 5.9 kg) completed trials to assess the validity and/or reliability of the HOTT. Peak rectal temperature (Tre) displayed strong agreement and low measurement error (0.19 °C) between HTT (38.7 ± 0.4 °C) and HOTT (38.6 ± 0.4 °C). Strong agreement was also displayed for physiological and perceptual measures between the two HOTT trials, including peak Tre (38.5 ± 0.4 °C vs. 38.5 ± 0.4 °C) and peak heart rate (182 ± 20 b min−1 vs. 182 ± 21 b min−1). The HOTT is the first tolerance test that assesses individuals’ responses whilst wearing protective clothing in high temperatures. It can consistently identify individuals’ levels of heat tolerance within a reduced time frame. In addition, it allows for participant monitoring over time and comparisons between individuals to be made. A continuum based approach is recommended when assessing individuals’ responses to the HOTT.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)42-50
Number of pages9
JournalJournal of Thermal Biology
Volume78
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 5 Sep 2018

Fingerprint

Feasibility Studies
heat tolerance
Protective Clothing
protective clothing
heat
Reproducibility of Results
testing
Temperature
Protective clothing
Hot Temperature
Thermogenesis
temperature
Occupations
monitoring
heat production
Heart Rate
Thermotolerance
heart rate
exercise
Measurement errors

Keywords

  • Heat tolerance
  • Occupational health
  • Personal protective equipment
  • Reliability
  • Validity

Cite this

@article{2a3e89cce0654440a917bc588a0d443d,
title = "A new occupational heat tolerance test: A feasibility study",
abstract = "Heat tolerance tests identify those susceptible to heat illnesses and monitor heat adaptations. Currently, tolerance tests do not replicate the uncompensable heat strain environments experienced in some occupations. In addition, tests can take up to 2 h to complete, and cannot offer intra and inter individual comparisons, due to the use of a fixed exercise intensity. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a new heat occupational tolerance test (HOTT: 40 min at 6 W kg−1 metabolic heat production, 50 °C 10{\%} RH, in protective clothing) to the standard heat tolerance test (HTT: 2 h walk at 5 km h−1 1{\%} gradient, 40 °C 40{\%} RH, in shorts and t-shirt). Eighteen participants (age: 21 ± 3 yrs, body mass: 81.3 ± 5.9 kg) completed trials to assess the validity and/or reliability of the HOTT. Peak rectal temperature (Tre) displayed strong agreement and low measurement error (0.19 °C) between HTT (38.7 ± 0.4 °C) and HOTT (38.6 ± 0.4 °C). Strong agreement was also displayed for physiological and perceptual measures between the two HOTT trials, including peak Tre (38.5 ± 0.4 °C vs. 38.5 ± 0.4 °C) and peak heart rate (182 ± 20 b min−1 vs. 182 ± 21 b min−1). The HOTT is the first tolerance test that assesses individuals’ responses whilst wearing protective clothing in high temperatures. It can consistently identify individuals’ levels of heat tolerance within a reduced time frame. In addition, it allows for participant monitoring over time and comparisons between individuals to be made. A continuum based approach is recommended when assessing individuals’ responses to the HOTT.",
keywords = "Heat tolerance, Occupational health, Personal protective equipment, Reliability, Validity",
author = "Watkins, {Emily R.} and Jemma Gibbons and Yanoula Dellas and Mark Hayes and Peter Watt and Richardson, {Alan J.}",
year = "2018",
month = "9",
day = "5",
doi = "10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.09.001",
language = "English",
volume = "78",
pages = "42--50",
journal = "Journal of Thermal Biology",
issn = "0306-4565",

}

A new occupational heat tolerance test : A feasibility study. / Watkins, Emily R.; Gibbons, Jemma; Dellas, Yanoula; Hayes, Mark; Watt, Peter; Richardson, Alan J.

In: Journal of Thermal Biology, Vol. 78, 05.09.2018, p. 42-50.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticleResearchpeer-review

TY - JOUR

T1 - A new occupational heat tolerance test

T2 - Journal of Thermal Biology

AU - Watkins, Emily R.

AU - Gibbons, Jemma

AU - Dellas, Yanoula

AU - Hayes, Mark

AU - Watt, Peter

AU - Richardson, Alan J.

PY - 2018/9/5

Y1 - 2018/9/5

N2 - Heat tolerance tests identify those susceptible to heat illnesses and monitor heat adaptations. Currently, tolerance tests do not replicate the uncompensable heat strain environments experienced in some occupations. In addition, tests can take up to 2 h to complete, and cannot offer intra and inter individual comparisons, due to the use of a fixed exercise intensity. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a new heat occupational tolerance test (HOTT: 40 min at 6 W kg−1 metabolic heat production, 50 °C 10% RH, in protective clothing) to the standard heat tolerance test (HTT: 2 h walk at 5 km h−1 1% gradient, 40 °C 40% RH, in shorts and t-shirt). Eighteen participants (age: 21 ± 3 yrs, body mass: 81.3 ± 5.9 kg) completed trials to assess the validity and/or reliability of the HOTT. Peak rectal temperature (Tre) displayed strong agreement and low measurement error (0.19 °C) between HTT (38.7 ± 0.4 °C) and HOTT (38.6 ± 0.4 °C). Strong agreement was also displayed for physiological and perceptual measures between the two HOTT trials, including peak Tre (38.5 ± 0.4 °C vs. 38.5 ± 0.4 °C) and peak heart rate (182 ± 20 b min−1 vs. 182 ± 21 b min−1). The HOTT is the first tolerance test that assesses individuals’ responses whilst wearing protective clothing in high temperatures. It can consistently identify individuals’ levels of heat tolerance within a reduced time frame. In addition, it allows for participant monitoring over time and comparisons between individuals to be made. A continuum based approach is recommended when assessing individuals’ responses to the HOTT.

AB - Heat tolerance tests identify those susceptible to heat illnesses and monitor heat adaptations. Currently, tolerance tests do not replicate the uncompensable heat strain environments experienced in some occupations. In addition, tests can take up to 2 h to complete, and cannot offer intra and inter individual comparisons, due to the use of a fixed exercise intensity. This study aimed to assess the validity and reliability of a new heat occupational tolerance test (HOTT: 40 min at 6 W kg−1 metabolic heat production, 50 °C 10% RH, in protective clothing) to the standard heat tolerance test (HTT: 2 h walk at 5 km h−1 1% gradient, 40 °C 40% RH, in shorts and t-shirt). Eighteen participants (age: 21 ± 3 yrs, body mass: 81.3 ± 5.9 kg) completed trials to assess the validity and/or reliability of the HOTT. Peak rectal temperature (Tre) displayed strong agreement and low measurement error (0.19 °C) between HTT (38.7 ± 0.4 °C) and HOTT (38.6 ± 0.4 °C). Strong agreement was also displayed for physiological and perceptual measures between the two HOTT trials, including peak Tre (38.5 ± 0.4 °C vs. 38.5 ± 0.4 °C) and peak heart rate (182 ± 20 b min−1 vs. 182 ± 21 b min−1). The HOTT is the first tolerance test that assesses individuals’ responses whilst wearing protective clothing in high temperatures. It can consistently identify individuals’ levels of heat tolerance within a reduced time frame. In addition, it allows for participant monitoring over time and comparisons between individuals to be made. A continuum based approach is recommended when assessing individuals’ responses to the HOTT.

KW - Heat tolerance

KW - Occupational health

KW - Personal protective equipment

KW - Reliability

KW - Validity

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85053219266&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.09.001

DO - 10.1016/j.jtherbio.2018.09.001

M3 - Article

VL - 78

SP - 42

EP - 50

JO - Journal of Thermal Biology

JF - Journal of Thermal Biology

SN - 0306-4565

ER -