A cost comparison study of using global positioning system technology (electronic monitoring) in a medium secure forensic psychiatric service

Paula Murphy, Lucy Potter, John Tully, Dave Hearn, Thomas Fahy, Paul McCrone

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

‘Electronic Monitoring’ (EM) uses devices to monitor individuals’ whereabouts. In 2010, South London and Maudsley medium secure unit introduced EM to monitor individuals on leave. Analysis after two years revealed EM was associated with increased unescorted leave and reduced leave violation; however, comparative costs were not established. This study aims to compare costs of EM for patients on leave by comparing average total cost per patient with and without EM. Costs were compared before and after implementation of EM. Total cost of leave for each group was divided by number of patients to generate average total cost per patient. The average total cost per patient without EM was £1702; £1617 with EM. Although cost decreased, this was not statistically significant. The results showed no significant difference between average total costs per patient before and after EM. The finding of EM being cost-neutral is cautiously optimistic. Further trials are recommended.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)57-69
Number of pages13
JournalJournal of Forensic Psychiatry and Psychology
Volume28
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Dec 2016

Keywords

  • Absconding rates
  • English law
  • Forensic mental health
  • Medium secure units
  • Risk
  • Forensic setting

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'A cost comparison study of using global positioning system technology (electronic monitoring) in a medium secure forensic psychiatric service'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this