The outcome of hip exercise in patellofemoral pain: A systematic review

Catherine Thompson, O. Krouwel, Raija Kuisma, Clair Hebron

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Patellofemoral pain (PFP) is one of the most common lower extremity conditions seen in clinical practice. Current evidence shows that there are hip strength deficits, delayed onset and shorter activation of gluteus medius in people with PFP. The aim of this review was to systematically review the literature to investigate the outcome of hip exercise inpeople with PFP. Method: AMED, CINAHL, Cochrane, EMBASE, PEDro, Pubmed, Science direct and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception to November 2014 for RCTs, non-randomised studies and case studies. Two independent reviewers assessed each paper for inclusion and quality. Results: Twenty one papers were identified;eighteen investigating strengthening exercise, two investigating the effect of neuromuscular exercise and one study investigated the effect of hip exercise for the prevention of PFP. Hip and knee strengthening programmes were shown to be equally effective. Limited evidence indicates that the addition of hip exercise to an exercise programme is beneficial. Limited evidence demonstrates that motor skill retraining in a participant group who displayed abnormal hip alignment in running improves pain. Conclusion: The evidence consistently demonstrated that both hip strengthening and neuromuscular exercise has a beneficial effect on pain and function in people with PFP. Strengthening exercise predominantly addressed abductor and external rotator muscle groups.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1-30
Number of pages30
JournalManual Therapy
Volume26
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Jun 2016

Bibliographical note

© 2016. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The outcome of hip exercise in patellofemoral pain: A systematic review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this