Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement

Robert Fish, Andrew Church, Michael Winter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

The construction of culture as a class of ecosystem service presents a significant test of the holistic ambitions of an ecosystems approach to decision making. In this paper we explore the theoretical challenges arising from efforts to understand ecosystems as objects of cultural concern and consider the operational complexities associated with understanding how, and with what consequences, knowledge about cultural ecosystem services are created, communicated and accounted for in real world decision making. We specifically forward and develop a conceptual framework for understanding cultural ecosystem services and related benefits in terms of the environmental spaces and cultural practices that arise from interactions between humans and ecosystems. The types of knowledge, and approaches to knowledge production, presumed by this relational, non-linear and place-based perspective on cultural ecosystem services are discussed and reviewed. The framework not only helps navigate more fully the challenge of operationalising ‘cultural ecosystem services’ but points to a more relational understanding of the ecosystem services framework as a whole. Extending and refining understanding through more ambitious engagements in interdisciplinarity remains important.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)208-217
Number of pages10
JournalEcosystem Services
Volume21
Issue numberB
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 11 Nov 2016

Bibliographical note

© 2016 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/BY/4.0/).

Keywords

  • Cultural ecosystem services
  • Ecosystem assessment
  • Theory
  • Methods
  • Interdisciplinarity

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Conceptualising cultural ecosystem services: A novel framework for research and critical engagement'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this