Excellence in doctoral supervision: an examination of authoritative sources across four countries in search of performance higher than competence

Alistair McCulloch, Vijay Kumar, Susan van Schalkwyk, Gina Wisker

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Supervision is generally recognised as playing a crucial role in the quality of a research student's doctoral experience and their academic outcomes and, in common with most areas of higher education, there is an oft-stated desire to pursue excellence in this important area. Excellence in research degree supervision is, however, an elusive concept and on close scrutiny most of the discussions of high-quality supervision, even those that purport to be identifying excellence, refer to competence rather than excellence. This paper examines two potentially national authoritative perspectives from which excellence in research degree supervision might be explicated (codes of practice and learning and teaching awards) from Australia, New Zealand, South Africa and the United Kingdom but concludes that the complex nature of the activity and the complexity of the concept itself mean that rather than identifying excellence in supervision we can only respond to claims for excellence.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)64-77
Number of pages14
JournalQuality in Higher Education
Volume22
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 27 May 2016

Bibliographical note

This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Quality in Higher Education on 27/05/2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/13538322.2016.1144904

Keywords

  • Research degree supervision
  • doctoral education
  • research degree supervisors
  • awards for supervision
  • learning and teaching awards
  • codes of practice
  • quality code

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Excellence in doctoral supervision: an examination of authoritative sources across four countries in search of performance higher than competence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this