15 Years of Whistleblowing Protection under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998: Are We Still Shooting the Messenger?

Jeanette Ashton

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the wake of high-profile scandals such as the catastrophic failings of the MidStaffordshire National Health Service Trust, this article contributes to the debate on the role of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA), now 15years in force, in promoting increased transparency in the workplace. The article briefly discusses legal protection for whistleblowers prior to the PIDA before proceeding to evaluate the development of the provisions through judicial decisions. The article considers the implications of the amendments effected by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, namely the public interest and good faith requirements, protection from detriment by a co-worker and extension of the ‘worker’ category. In drawing on quantitative and qualitative data, the article highlights the frequent disparity between an organisation’s ‘party line’ and the cultural reality of the workplace. The article explores the difficulties inherent in evaluating the success of legislation, which essentially aims to change attitudes in the workplace, but contends that the PIDA continues, albeit incrementally, to move towards its intended purpose.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)29-52
Number of pages24
JournalIndustrial Law Journal
Volume44
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2015

Fingerprint

public interest
act
workplace
party organization
legal protection
attitude change
co-worker
scandal
transparency
amendment
faith
health service
legislation
worker
reform

Bibliographical note

© Industrial Law Society

Cite this

@article{9d05d1ca513841c3bf7e2ef9e5022ae9,
title = "15 Years of Whistleblowing Protection under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998: Are We Still Shooting the Messenger?",
abstract = "In the wake of high-profile scandals such as the catastrophic failings of the MidStaffordshire National Health Service Trust, this article contributes to the debate on the role of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA), now 15years in force, in promoting increased transparency in the workplace. The article briefly discusses legal protection for whistleblowers prior to the PIDA before proceeding to evaluate the development of the provisions through judicial decisions. The article considers the implications of the amendments effected by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, namely the public interest and good faith requirements, protection from detriment by a co-worker and extension of the ‘worker’ category. In drawing on quantitative and qualitative data, the article highlights the frequent disparity between an organisation’s ‘party line’ and the cultural reality of the workplace. The article explores the difficulties inherent in evaluating the success of legislation, which essentially aims to change attitudes in the workplace, but contends that the PIDA continues, albeit incrementally, to move towards its intended purpose.",
author = "Jeanette Ashton",
note = "{\circledC} Industrial Law Society",
year = "2015",
month = "1",
day = "1",
doi = "10.1093/indlaw/dwu029",
language = "English",
volume = "44",
pages = "29--52",
journal = "Industrial Law Journal",
issn = "0305-9332",
number = "1",

}

15 Years of Whistleblowing Protection under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998: Are We Still Shooting the Messenger? / Ashton, Jeanette.

In: Industrial Law Journal, Vol. 44, No. 1, 01.01.2015, p. 29-52.

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

TY - JOUR

T1 - 15 Years of Whistleblowing Protection under the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998: Are We Still Shooting the Messenger?

AU - Ashton, Jeanette

N1 - © Industrial Law Society

PY - 2015/1/1

Y1 - 2015/1/1

N2 - In the wake of high-profile scandals such as the catastrophic failings of the MidStaffordshire National Health Service Trust, this article contributes to the debate on the role of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA), now 15years in force, in promoting increased transparency in the workplace. The article briefly discusses legal protection for whistleblowers prior to the PIDA before proceeding to evaluate the development of the provisions through judicial decisions. The article considers the implications of the amendments effected by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, namely the public interest and good faith requirements, protection from detriment by a co-worker and extension of the ‘worker’ category. In drawing on quantitative and qualitative data, the article highlights the frequent disparity between an organisation’s ‘party line’ and the cultural reality of the workplace. The article explores the difficulties inherent in evaluating the success of legislation, which essentially aims to change attitudes in the workplace, but contends that the PIDA continues, albeit incrementally, to move towards its intended purpose.

AB - In the wake of high-profile scandals such as the catastrophic failings of the MidStaffordshire National Health Service Trust, this article contributes to the debate on the role of the Public Interest Disclosure Act 1998 (PIDA), now 15years in force, in promoting increased transparency in the workplace. The article briefly discusses legal protection for whistleblowers prior to the PIDA before proceeding to evaluate the development of the provisions through judicial decisions. The article considers the implications of the amendments effected by the Enterprise and Regulatory Reform Act 2013, namely the public interest and good faith requirements, protection from detriment by a co-worker and extension of the ‘worker’ category. In drawing on quantitative and qualitative data, the article highlights the frequent disparity between an organisation’s ‘party line’ and the cultural reality of the workplace. The article explores the difficulties inherent in evaluating the success of legislation, which essentially aims to change attitudes in the workplace, but contends that the PIDA continues, albeit incrementally, to move towards its intended purpose.

U2 - 10.1093/indlaw/dwu029

DO - 10.1093/indlaw/dwu029

M3 - Article

VL - 44

SP - 29

EP - 52

JO - Industrial Law Journal

JF - Industrial Law Journal

SN - 0305-9332

IS - 1

ER -